Dondi, C., Moretti, M., Husson, A.M. and Pawlowski, J.M. (2005) ‘Interim report: CWA 1 - providing good practice for elearning quality approaches’, CEN/ISSS, [online] Available from: http://cms.eun.org/shared/data/pdf/cwa1_20051118.pdf (Accessed 6 November 2008).
Interesting read of what appears to be a system for assessing submissions looking for a stamp of approval or recognition as "quality work" or an emerging "good practice".
Criteria for "quality work" includes the need to demonstrate the following
- has been "field' tested and trialed
- is culturally appropriate, contextually relevant
- addresses a current need, issue, problem that required monitoring for quality improvement
- is well documented
- demonstrates improvement and effectiveness
- can be used in an new context but in a similar field
- invites continuous improvement (promotes improvement)
In short, a good practice
- has been tried and tested in the field
- clearly targeted and adapted for a specific user group (takes the user into consideration)
- relevant or current (deals with current issues being faced in the field by other practitioners)
- is presented transparently so that it can be clearly understood by other practitioners
- demonstrates its benefits
- has broad support from other users who have used it
- is transferable to others ( it can be used by others in a new context)
- promotes improvement (quality sought after via feedback loops)
It would seem to me that these are qualities to be looking for and using to realize a good poster presentation.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment