Activity 2.5 - tools & systems for reflective activity

I've become a real convert to using "blogs" for cataloging my reflections. Much of this I'm pinning down to seeing others modeling this sort of thing for a while now (my list of blogs that I follow are in the right hand column of my H808 - my notes blog). This to my way of thinking (or reflecting?) is the way to go. I really like the ease at which I can add notes, edit the notes, invite comments on those notes, go back to reviewing them .. tagging them.. even commenting on my own notes .. to see my development of ideas and thoughts over time. This process is a continual one - a "reflective continuum". One recent discovery is how I can set up my email to type up a note as if it was a "blog" entry, send it and by doing so, have it immediately posted to the blog. No need to go to the blog and enter it.

As to creating multiple blogs (HLC) - .. I haven't thought to do that .. but wonder if I might get confused. Perhaps if the audience I'm looking to talk to expects a fairly predictable register I might think to do that . A register that is more formal than the one that might come out of the immediate response and informal manner of a "stream of consciousness" blog.. though I then have to wonder about the "integrity / authenticity" of that. However, its apparent to me that to have one blog , the tags and archiving features both become critical to sorting or finding things later one.

Another support resource that I'm finding really useful and would like to share, is "post its" or "turbo notes" (http://turbonote.com - there are slew of them). These are little virtual "stickems" or "epost-its". Their attraction is their immediacy. I can realize one in a "click" when I find myself reacting to something I've read or thought of, jotting down my reaction... and then reflecting on it. The immediacy is the critical thing.. and I can also keep the article that I'm reflecting on up on the screen at the same time. The notes themselves can also be collated, searched and sorted so I can quickly collect and collate them.

Julie mentioned the idea of using video or audio for recording reflections. Hmm... not sure where I stand on that. How easy is it to use? I can't help but think it would take a while for me to get over the "performance" nature of recording .. to make the reflections truly authentic .. and the added value of getting intonation or visual cues seems pretty small compared to the hassles of transferring, cataloguing etc. (though with YouTube I've only discovered recently just how easy it is to tag even videos - amazing).

Activity 2.3. - Reflection & learning

Posting
Karen J.Ogilvie, Reflection - Karen's first thoughts, Sun Sept 28 5:20 pm

Readings
Moon, Jenny (2001)
H808, Assignment guide


My read of the H808 Course Guide and Assignment guide is that the reflective work that we do in the form of "core activities" will become important evidence to support our case for how we have realized "professional" or "personal" development via H808.

The strength of these "core activities" and their reflections will in many ways determine the strength of the work we do later on with the TMAs. I also see how each one of those reflection pieces is really a snap shot of my understanding of a concept at a certain point of time in the course. As we proceed further into the course, I'm anticipating the need to revisit these, to review / edit / revise them based on still more reflection.. I also anticipate discovering how my depth of understanding on certain issues / definitions has changed over time... and that this becomes an important objective of the course.

In theory, the contents and organization of the eportfolio should be a byproduct of these deep reflections. To draw from Schon, I'm also expecting to experience a form of "reflection in action" or "reflection on action" (depending on the "time constraints" I'm under) as we move to realizing an eportfolio. (H808 - Assignment guide - page 3 .. In your reflective commentaries your tutor will be looking for evidences that you have ...."

In reference to Moon, I can already see that reflection is going to occur through the active use of the "reflective continuum". That reflection needs to be academic rather than "common sense" in approach, meaning that we need to strive to put what we read/learn via the material into a clear personal context to improve the depth of understanding of it. The activities that direct us to deeper reflection include summarizing what we've read, integrating it with our personal situations or experiences (i.e. experiences, beliefs, etc.) then testing it with others. I can see myself using the framework developed by Hatton & Smith (Moon) as another means to realizing this depth.

Is the notion that some forms of reflection are better suited to some disciplines relevant to my own subject area or practice?
Yes.. First of I'm conscious of the need to reflect. How it impacts on my own learning. I see it as critical to improving the effectiveness of what I do. It typically takes on some urgency when something doesn't go as planned or was a flop. I then often review assumptions that I made in planning something. It could be about my learners, the context .. but I try to focus on the things that I have control over .. which can be somewhat defeating. I have to remind myself to also examine outside factors that may have contributed to a problem. The biggest problem I encounter with realizing reflection .. is making time to consciously do it and then the issue is to what degree have I done it - or to what depth that I can rely upon it or feel confident about acting upon it.

Choice of other media for reflective activity?
I real find summarizing and writing an ideal reflective activity .. and it's greatly facilitated by word processing. Blogs seem a good place to collect and collate the ideas too, especially for future review and reflection. I already find myself making "comments" to myself.. (which seems a bit odd - sort of like "talking" to yourself asynchronously). I've had experience with podcasting but unless I'd want to review how I said things (i.e. register cues) I can't imagine that it would add much of any value to my reflective process. If anything, I currently see their production and assembly even detracting from realizing meaningful reflection.

Though this last point is being challenged by Karen's note about how medical students she works with are producing video as a reflective activity. Topics include "how well they work with people, how they communicate to ultimately make descisions". How this same video is shared with peers to get feedback on "how well they carried out the task".

I asked ...

Curious? Is this a video that they take of themselves or is it a video that they have arranged be taken of themselves where they do a "voice over" reflective piece on afterwards? What value do you and the students "see" in having the video over writing things down in a journal. Do they not get bogged down with producing it .. or knowing that their peers will "see" them? Do the visual cues (body language) cloud the ability to review the reflection or do they act as sort of a "truth litmus" test for peers to judge and mention in their feedback? Tons of questions here. Sorry.

Summary - PDP work (Moon) - my notes - 1

The reflection continuum?
A 5 step process..

1. noticing - catching one's eye .. consciously or unconsciously
2. making sense of it - getting to know the material .. but only in how it interconnects (within itself)
3. making meaning - getting to understand that the material is "meaningful" .. a holistic view
4. working with meaning - getting to understand how the material relates to other ideas .. relationships with other materials .. which may change
5. tranforming learning - evidence that the new learning has changed / transformed one's understandings of things .. creative / idiosyncratic responses

Steps 1 & 2 are more indicative of surface learning

how do we demonstrate learning through reflection .. using this continuum?
Suggested from my reading that we

• simply realize / demonstrate stages 3 to 5
• represent / summarize our learning (i.e. writing an essay, to explain something in our own way / words)
• upgrade our learning (integrating what we have learned with our understanding of other things - i.e. tutorials, using the discourse of the subject .. integrating ideas)

how do we support reflection in learning?
Look at the characteristics of reflection .. (review what needs to be in place to support these characteristics?)

• reflection slows down activity (students need time to process material and make links with other ideas)
• reflection promotes ownership of the material (need to allow time for students to put it into "student" voice, one's own context)
• reflection encourages metacognition - awareness of one's own cognitive functioning (need to promote student awareness of their learning processes - study skills prog)
• reflection emerges out of unstructured material (need to reflect on material that is not structured, to make sense of it)

So online learning / elearning may potentially support reflection much more so than traditional "classroom" based learning because it arguably supports a student's need

• for quiet and time to process material,
• to summarize material in their own words,
• to put material into a personal context ..
  

However, it should preferably be structured so the learner is not obliged to simply follow it lock step yet it can't be unstructured so the learner is too challenged to realize access to the content s ( i.e. choosing from a variety of reading selections for a unit in H808).

Classroom management issues promote the use of a very structured environment (time / place dependent) . Classroom management issues and physical space / time limitations strongly direct instructional design…and type of learning possible because a teacher often feels pressured to present the material within a pre-set time frame (maybe not enough time for Ss to absorb and contextualize it).

• much less quiet and time to process material,certainly in the classroom
  
• much less time to summarize material in their own words,
• much less time to put material into a personal context ..
• to be aware of their learning style ..

Thus classroom instruction can indirectly support more surface learning from students.

Let me "reflect" on this.