Showing posts with label skill - critique. Show all posts
Showing posts with label skill - critique. Show all posts

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Activity 7.4 - An example of self assessment

Source
Ogilvie, Karen (2008) 'Re(2): Activity 7.4 - Robin's self Assess', Open University - H808 aeb324 R self ass forum, 05 December 2008, 11:27 PM

I found Robin's presentation very convincing.. Key for me was drawing on evidence that most of us are already familiar with (so we have some "reasonable" proof that it hasn't been fabricated, perhaps "planted" ;-) ) and we could see the series of related activities evolving (if we were prepared to follow them). In fact the discussion boards offer us a wonderful ability to "follow" at least most of the progression.

However, I can also relate to Karen's earlier comment
Having said that, I'm not convinced that I fully understand what a 'principled appraoch to self-assessment is'... - Karen Ogilvie
Perhaps the principles need to be spelled out so that we're entirely clear about how Robin's self assessment is grounded.

The use of three pieces was significant. Is this intended to be a form of triangulation? I bring this up because I'm recalling my phone interview with Kathy Chang Barker (a Canadian expert on eportfolios) where I asked her a [ fcp://@oufcnt1.open.ac.uk,%231004824/IET%20H808%2008I/H808%2008I%20Tutor%20Groups/H808%2008I%20Annes%20Group/H808%20aeb324%20Ideas/%23156388667 ]similar question. and she came back to me with this answer.

What I'm still not clear on is the relevance of rating one's ability here. That appears to be so subjective .. almost out of the blue .. that it's practically useless to anyone other than oneself. What might be more meaningful to me would be a realization of a new learning objective that relates to this or came out of this exercise... and perhaps over time, one could use the attainment of the these various objectives as evidence of "above average" ability.

Monday, January 19, 2009

Activity 3.4 - choosing an ePortfolio system

Recall as part of the University's mission, that our student's expect to graduate as bilingual, it literate, global citizens and leaders. The eportfolio concept offers our undergraduates a number of opportunites to evidence their development in these core areas. As possible examples,

  • language development via the collection of speaking and writing samples
  • IT development via the production and assembly of evidence and in the design of the eportfolio to hold them
  • global citizenship realized via the use of ICT tools to facilitate constructive dialogue with people from other cultures around the world
  • leadership skill development via documentation of reflection on community based issues and their choice of actions


To support this we should expect to provide students with an eportfolio strategy that addresses the following four key points.

promoting reflection
Fundamental to any strategy's selection will be its ability to promote more than the collection of evidence but a reflection activity cycle (Richards) and host the lifelong and lifewide benefits that it brings (Moon, Richards). To realize this, students may need templates with guided focus questions that encourage them to inter relate concepts learned across their courses of study and to revist these themes throughout their undergrad studies.

flexibility vs structure
It should be flexibile enough to address changing student needs, levels of competency and choice. Undergraduates collecting evidence for the first time may require the highly structured environment as noted above(Stefani, 2005). Yet as students progress, they may wish to customize or even opt out of this structured environment to use the eportfolio strategy to meet other needs as they prepare to move on from their undergrad studies (Jafari).

Ease of Use
During their stay, students may differ widely in their interest in IT skills development. Note they may also need to communicate in both Arabic (L1) and English (L2) . Thus to support the portfolio strategy's development, it needs to facilitate the use of IT at these varying levels of interest and it must do so in two languages (Jafari) Thus the chosen eportfolio strategy needs to be easy enough to master and realizable in such a manner that it does not draw the student away from its prime purpose - to support documentation of evidence and to facilitate reflection.

collaboration
Per work by Vuorikari and Batson, the eportfolio strategy should facilitate interaction and sharing of knowledge with ones peers, advisors and instructors. To do so provides students with both immediate support and learning opportunites via the exchanges with peers. These have also been found to encourage the much sought after higher order learning, thinking and knowledge construction (Richards).

The current review of "off the shelf" eportfolio products leads me to conclude that few come close to addressing the mix of needs listed above. Many provide forms of structure but without much room for student customization at later stages of development (i.e. graduation). Little or no mention is also made of their ability to support the use of languages other than English.

In lieu of these shortcomings, I recommend investigating the use of the growing prevelance of web 2.0 tools such as blogs, wikis and aggregators. All such utilities are readily available and often for free. Some like blogs inherently support reflection, others like wikis support easy editing, high degrees of customization and personalization. Yet can be readily supported via the use of the same strategies noted above. Via the use of aggregators, mashups of these various tools and their contents are also possible (Batson, 2008) thus making them a much more attractive proposition.


Sources

Batson, Trent (2008) ‘ePortfolios: Hot Once Again’, Campus Technology, [online] Available from: http://campustechnology.com/articles/60933/ (Accessed 26 September 2008).


Jafari, Ali (2004) ‘The “Sticky” ePortfolio System: Tackling Challenges and Identifying Attribute’, Educause Review, [online] Available from: http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Review/TheStickyePortfolioSystem/40485?time=1222282897 (Accessed 24 September 2008).


Moon, Jenny (2001) ‘PDP working paper 4: reflection in higher education learning’, document, [online] Available from: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/resourcedatabase/id72_Reflection_in_Higher_Education_Learning.rtf (Accessed 2 October 2008).


Richards, Cameron (2005) ‘Activity-reflection e-portfolios: An approach to the problem of effectively integrating ICTs in teaching and learning’, Murdoch University - Teaching & Learning Forum 2005, [online] Available from: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2005/refereed/richards.html (Accessed 5 October 2008).


Stefani, Lorraine (2005) ‘The Role of CPD in Teaching Quality Enhancement’, pdf, Auckland, New Zealand , [online] Available from: http://64.233.183.104/u/LearningTechnology?q=cache:YRY_ajTIbh0J:www.alt.ac.uk/docs/lorraine_stefani_paper.doc+Stefani&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&ie=UTF-8 (Accessed 30 September 2008).


Vuorikari , R. (2006) ‘‘National policies and case studies on the use of portfolios in teacher training' - European Schoolnet 2006’, [online] Available from: http://insight.eun.org/shared/data/insight/documents/e_portfolio_teacher_training_final_10_05.pdf (Accessed 28 September 2008).

Monday, January 5, 2009

Activity 9.1. - Desktop research - blogging in education (report)

Sources
Buckingham, Jim ‘H808 - My notes’, blog, [online] Available from: http://buckinsand.blogspot.com/ (Accessed 5 January 2009).

Chandler, Jeff (2008) ‘WordPress Forum User Guide ’, Weblog Tools Collection, blog, [online] Available from: http://weblogtoolscollection.com/archives/2008/12/24/wordpress-forum-user-guide/ (Accessed 5 January 2009).

Crawford, Justin ‘The Campus Press Blogs ’, Educause Learning Initiative, [online] Available from: http://www.educause.edu/ELI/ELIDiscoveryToolGuidetoBloggin/TheCampusPressBlogs/13563 (Accessed 5 January 2009).

Educause (n.d.) ‘What Faculty Want to Know ’, Educause Learning Initiative, [online] Available from: http://www.educause.edu/ELI/ELIDiscoveryToolGuidetoBloggin/WhatFacultyWanttoKnow/13566 (Accessed 5 January 2009).

GeoBlogs ‘Google Earth Users Guide Project’, blog, [online] Available from: http://googlearthusersguide.blogspot.com/ (Accessed 5 January 2009).

Peachey, Nik ‘Nik's Learning Technology Blog’, blog, [online] Available from: http://nikpeachey.blogspot.com/ (Accessed 5 January 2009).

Stevens, Vance ‘adVancEducation’, blog, [online] Available from: http://advanceducation.blogspot.com/ (Accessed 5 January 2009).

Various ‘UMW Blogs’, blog, [online] Available from: http://umwblogs.org/ (Accessed 1 January 2009).

Various ‘Zotero: The Next-Generation Research Tool’, blog, [online] Available from: http://www.zotero.org/blog/ (Accessed 5 January 2009).

Weller, Martin (2008) ‘Blogging isn't about fame’, The Ed Techie, [online] Available from: http://nogoodreason.typepad.co.uk/no_good_reason/2008/12/blogging-isnt-about-fame.html (Accessed 5 January 2009).
Categories are
  1. subject domain / topic
  2. professional reflections
  3. personal reflections
  4. student reflections
  5. community building / sharing
  6. utility - how to do
For each category, I provide
  • a short description
  • an example or two to help illustrate it
  • comment on some of the main issues that arise from using blogs in this way

subject domain / topic
These are blogs that choose to focus on a specific subject domain in education or educational topic. There were many examples to choose from - mathematics, economics as well as English composition or literature. Most notable for me were these two and their work in promoting the critical use of technology in EFL instruction.

Nik Peachey's "Nik's Learning Technology Blog" and Vance Steven's ‘adVancEducation’, blog, both examine educational technology issues that they have personally encountered in their work context as EFL instructors in differing parts of the world. Peachey (Morocco) examines readily available specific technologies or web based tools and examines how how they might be used by educators. He also offers step by step guidelines on how to realize them. Notably absent? Comments from readers. Peachey's work tends to be more "how to" focussed.

Stevens (UAE) tends to place research work that was done to support various conference presentations, on his blog for broader review from readers. However, he also includes interesting annecdotal and reflective review of his experiences or encounters at these same conferences. Steven's work tends to examine an assortment of issues related to exploring the use of a given technology.
professional reflections
Here a professional uses their blog as a place to put out a plea for review, inviting open dialogue from a community of similar professionals to have their ideas tested and challenged.

Martin Weller's ‘Blogging isn't about fame’, demonstrates this sort of dialogue or engagement with a broader audience who take him to task on his earlier pronouncement on the value of technocrati ratings. He uses this post to clarify what he meant .. such ratings act as a "very rough proxy" of how well one is communicating one's ideas.

Stevens, Vance ‘adVancEducation’, blog, also invites the same. However, because the typical blog entry is fairly short (and typically needs to be to invite readership).. it appears to be somewhat problematic when attempting to discuss or present very detailed or complex issues
personal reflections
Finding these is problematic because they are often hidden from view. However, I know they exist because I and many of my colleagues have asked students to create them. I suspect that these make up the bulk of the many millions of blogs spoken of in literature on blogging. Here students can practice free writing, journalling and sharing their ideas with a select group of trusted friends or even instructors. Are they educational? They have the potential to be .. even if they invite personal reflection from the writer and are done outside of a structured formal education setting.
student reflections
Very similar to personal reflections however these tend to be more project or goal based. For example, all of the blogs for H808 are in most cases compiled based on the various activities assigned in the course. These tend to be more academic based reflections.

My own H808 - notes blog is but one example of this.

A few issues raised here? Educause writers note that some critiques argue instructors may be robbing the exercise of pleasure and purpose the moment they are made compulsory. Others express concerns about protecting student privacy , how to assess such developmental work, and where to host such services to protect students still in development.
community building / sharing
Blogs or often an aggregation of blogs and their ability to provide constantly dynamic content can be used as a form of community building or informing tool in an educational setting. More and more examples of this are emerging in college or university contexts and often employing communications students.

A blog set up by the University of Mary Washington is actually a collection of blogs made by various communities found within the broader university community. Justin Crawford's own reflective piece on the origins of just such a blog press and the unexpected problems it encountered are mentioned in yet another article.
utility - how to do
Many online user manuals that have been drawn up to support web based utilities, are blogs. This is especially useful when a product is either still evolving or experiencing "bugs". Updates can be noted and made immediately available to users via RSS feeds. The new users can also comment on these updates thus realizing feedback for program developers to help improve their product. In other words, the blog becomes a user manual that has been tried, tested and written by users.

Zotero is an open source product that used a blog to announce updates, solicit reviews of those updates, etc.

Another borderline example is the "Google Earth Users Guide Project". It borders on being a Geography related (topic based) blog but provides readers with ideas and instructions on ways in which Google Earth can be used in education.

Still another is Chandler, Jeff Chandler's work on a ‘WordPress Forum User Guide ’, and the reaction from end users to it.

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Activity 7.3 - Assessing PDP

Sources

Burgess, Hilary (n.d.) ‘Assessment: 2. Self and peer assessment’, The Higher Education Academy: Social Work and Social Policy (SWAP), [online] Available from: http://sorubank.ege.edu.tr/~bouo/DLUE/Chapter-08/Chapter-8-makaleler/Assessment%202_%20Self%20and%20peer%20assessment.htm (Accessed 4 December 2008).



Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto ‘Teaching and Learning by Health Professionals:
Practical Issues and Approaches - Sample Learning Contract’, Department of Family and Community Medicine - University of Toronto, [online] Available from: http://dfcm19.med.utoronto.ca/GradStudies/CourseMaterials/t&l/learning_contract1.htm (Accessed 4 December 2008).



Make a note of any of these approaches that you think could be applied to your own context of practice.

I'm in favour of the "learning contract" idea and see the list of competencies that we've come up with from Unit 6 becoming very handy for developing such a contract. To support this would require a fairly standard framework (Burgess) that invites the inclusion of still more frameworks / rubrics that the PLOT tool suggests.

This is very similar to a learning contract idea that I saw implemented in an experiential / alternative education program that I was involved in as a Group Leader some 20 years ago (Katimavik in Canada). Here the participants (a small group of 12 young adults) carried out some personal and group reflection exercises .. and then designed their own mission / values statement .. then personal and/or group objectives. They also knew what resources were available to them so they could map out how they might achieve these objectives (i.e. hiring a nutritionist to learn how to eat properly). Assessment? There wasn't any formal assessment..

As I see it, we've potentially got the same thing going on here. We've looked at the mission / values associated with being a learning technologist.. and are asked to review these to come up with a set of objectives that are aligned with that mission / those values and then plot how we might achieve them .. preferably with input and support from fellow group or team members. Assessment? Part of it might include how successfully aligned one's personal development objectives line up with professional and personal values and principles.

On a related note, I've only recently been advocating the inclusion of pdps at my work as a means to aligning faculty and staff development with the University's mission to promote teaching excellence. I see this being realized so that limited resources are aligned to address University directives but at the same time, the professional or personal objectives of an individual.

In effect, the University's governing board outlines its own strategic goals, then invites the various colleges to interpret those goals as well as their own to create department specific "strategic plans". These in turn could be used by faculty and staff to produce their own pdps that address their specific professional needs but align them once again with those of their department. These could then be included as part of one's annual performance review.

Activity 7.2 - Clegg review - types of cpd

Source

Clegg, Sue, Tan, Jon and Saeidi , Saiedeh (2002) ‘Reflecting or Acting? Reflective Practice and Continuing Professional Development in Higher Education - Reflective Practice’, Reflective Practice , 3(1), pp. 131-146, [online] Available from: http://pdfserve.informaworld.com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/44605_751304133_713693219.pdf (Accessed 3 December 2008).

My take on the Clegg article?
There is no "one" way or method to realize effective cpd through reflection. In some cases, the argument is made that written reflection may in fact be counter productive - people either approach it as an exercise to meet the expectations of others or do quite alright without it entirely. However written reflection still seems to be used as a means to evidence pd.

Clegg suggests that there are essentially 4 general types of professional development strategies involving reflection and these have come about from research on people engaged in CPD. Key factors that determine selection?
  • experience - the person needs to have a degree of experience before they have something to reflect upon
  • time pressures - availability to carry out the task properly
  • priority - judging when and how frequently such reflective work is required
  • thinking styles - ie. one's whole thinking process was difficult to capture via written reflection (writing didn't crystalize ideas but undermined them)

Those 4 types?
  • immediate action
  • immediate reflection
  • deferred action
  • deferred reflection
This challenged my first interpretation of the chart where I thought that there might be a progression (i.e. encouraging someone to move from A through to D, that the quality and depth of one's reflection improved accordingly). Where did that come from? My assumption that the most meaningful and purposeful reflection would come out of deferment? Apparently not so.

Which perspective do I favour?
I actually favour the Dealtry version... because I believe in the need for some sort of macro view - a continuum for professional development to be purposeful and meaningful - thus most effective. The Clegg article is more of a micro look - important for opening my eyes to how cpd can be realized in any number of ways dependent on a variety of factors. I'm also conscious of how I might be inclined to accept as equally viable all four perspectives in my own professional development now .. when before I would have favoured D as being the most desirable.


In respect to TMA 2 .. ?
The readings point out to me that the road to professional development can take on a variety of different paths - dependent on one's macro view - Dealtry - where I am in my "learning how to learn" / my "incremental learning" .. and dependent on one's micro view - Clegg - where a variety of factors may determine my choice of action and reflection (and evidence of my development). Both perspectives, one explicitly and the other implicitly, promote the notion that such cpd requires our ownership to be most meaningful and purposeful.

Activity 7.2 - Review of Dealtry & the "savvy" learner

Source

Dealtry, Richard (2004) ‘Emerald: Professional Practice - The savvy learner’, Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1/2), pp. 101-109, [online] Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/Insight/viewPDF.jsp?Filename=html/Output/Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Pdf/0860160110.pdf (Accessed 3 December 2008).


Ogilvie, Karen (2008) ‘Re: Activity 7.2 - Jim's thoughts on Dealtry reading’, H808 - aeb324 Unit 7, [online] Available from: fcp://@oufcnt1.open.ac.uk,%231004824/H808%20aeb324%20Unit%207%20/H808%20aeb324%20Prof%20learning/%23162362990 (Accessed 6 December 2008).


My take on Dealtry reading?
A tremendous focus on empowering each one of us to "learn how to learn" and in the process, realize a form of self actualization that is termed "gradualism" to realize becoming a "savvy" (knowledgeable) learner . Rather than asking the question "what shall I learn?" and waiting for others to answer it... its being suggested that we may be in the best position to answer the question ourselves if we reflect on where we have been, understand / recognize what we have learned, contemplate where we are now .. to then make the next "best" move .. perhaps even contemplating integrating that learning into other aspects of our life - not just for the benefit of ourselves or our organization but beyond to include family, friends and the community in general.

This is more than simply learning through doing.. but integrating our learning with past experiences to make it more meaningful, and purposeful. Sounds almost like a form of meditation.

Karen made a good point when I posted this on the FCC. She noted how much this sounded like the experiential loop that Kolb speaks of.
sounds like something that's been around for quite a while (Kolb 1984 I think) - experiential learning, with a bit if added flair.... sorry, i think I;m turning into a cynical 'Grumpy Old Woman' (BBC TV) but there's so little around that's new - just regurgitated with a bit of glitter on,,,,

don't get me wrong though - meditation is good!
- Karen Ogilvie

Thursday, December 4, 2008

Activity 7.1 - reflections on professional values - where do they come from?

I'm sensing that the work of developing a code of ethics or principles for each profession as something that took time.. that it's really a profession's response to ensuring the public good is protected. The need is to meet minimum public expectations of a profession so that as a profession (and as a professional) they gain / maintain the trust and confidence of the public. They bolster their credibility and respect in the eyes of the public.
Keywords - trust / confidence
leading to
Keywords - credibility / respect
A little bit of speculation here but I don't imagine that such trust and confidence for current professions came over night. I imagine a series of occasions / events / even misfortunes where such trust or confidence may have been tested .. and the profession addressed these through the further refinement of their guiding principles and ethics. This was done as a means to protecting the "profession". In other words, defining the public good that each profession seeks to address is key to winning the trust and confidence of the public it seeks to serve. This becomes the means to defining these principles and ethics for each profession.

That may be easier to identify for an engineer or doctor, perhaps more challenging for an educator but I sense much more difficult for an elearning practitioner.. especially when there isn't much of a history to the "profession".

New questions emerge out of this...
What public interest or service is being addressed by elearning "professionals" that the public deems to be important .. that the public needs to be confident in leaving to elearning professionals to address?
  • Perhaps efficient, effective, judicious use of technology in realizing learning outcomes .. cause for reflection.

What about defining the public? Is that public broadly defined or more focussed / specialized / specific?
  • The public served may be educators, administrators, managers. What expertise are they seeking? .. cause for more reflection.

Activity 6.4 - CMALT and LSN certification schemes - my observations

Sources
CMALT (n.d.) ‘CMALT Prospectus ’, [online] Available from: http://www.alt.ac.uk/docs/cmalt-prospectusv4.pdf (Accessed 30 November 2008).

The Learning and Skills Network (2007) ‘A Professional Development Framework for E-learning’, [online] Available from: https://oufe.open.ac.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.learningtechnologies.ac.uk/files/0627161Framework.pdf (Accessed 2 December 2008).

Lessner, Ellen (2007) ‘CMALT experience - an individual perspective ’, [online] Available from: http://www.alt.ac.uk/docs/Ellen_Lessner_CMALT_experience_200711203.pdf (Accessed 2 December 2008).


Lisewski, Bernard and Joyce, Paul (n.d.) ‘Examining the five-stage e-moderating model: Designed and emergent practice in the learning technology profession’, [online] Available from: http://learn.open.ac.uk/mod/resourcepage/view.php?id=90970&direct=1 (Accessed 24 November 2008).

Oliver, Martin (2002) ‘What do Learning Technologists do?’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 30(4), pp. 245-252.

Write a short 300 word account of what you have learned about the development and certification of elearning practitioners in this unit.
Much of the interest in accrediting learning technologists comes from a recognition of
  • the isolation common to many learning technologists (including myself) (Oliver)(Lessner)
  • the problems with credibility (i.e. academics not recognizing the expertise / competencies that a LT role can hold and instead reducing the position to a service provider or enabler; their practices are poorly understood (Oliver) (LSN) ; involves more than simply selecting from an off the shelf arsenal of products / services (Lisewski)
  • the unique nature of the position (autonomy, without authority, yet still being promoted as a strategic change agent) .. (Oliver)
It appears that learning technologists have moved to address these (and other) issues first through the formation an association (ALT), and secondly through the set up of accreditation (CMALT or LSN). Such efforts also raise the profile of research in learning technology and the pursuit of professionalism by Learning Technologists.

While not directly stated, it's clear that this work ultimately improves credibility and respectability for the LT position. (CMALT prospectus) (LSN) .
My own review of competencies yielded some important insights.
The LSN competencies were subdivided by role - general practitioner, policy maker, expert adviser, developer, leader. This proved to be much more interesting because it pointed out to me just how many "hats" one can wear as an Learning Technologist .. and the need to switch those hats - i.e. from learner to adviser to leader.. Which lead me to suggest yet another challenging competency - the need to know when to switch those hats .... thus I'm deducing the need to be a fairly seasoned communicator in order to recognize that.

Based upon my interpretation and review of the competencies from CMALT, all six of my pdp objectives tied into atleast one of the CMALT Core competencies.. and in three pdp objectives a CMALT Specialist competency was identified. Noticeable was a focus on operational issues in 4 of the 6 objectives. This has me wondering if I am unknowingly "complying" with management's view of me as an learning technologist as "service provider"(?).

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Reflections - Activity 6.3 - what does a learning technologist do?

Sources

Lisewski, Bernard and Joyce, Paul (n.d.) ‘Examining the five-stage e-moderating model:
Designed and emergent practice in the learning technology profession’, [online] Available from: http://learn.open.ac.uk/mod/resourcepage/view.php?id=90970&direct=1 (Accessed 24 November 2008).


Oliver, Martin (2002) ‘What do Learning Technologists do?’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 30(4), pp. 245-252.


What do learning technologists do?
I've only been assuming this postion for a few months now and I can really relate to both the Oliver and Lisewski articles.

Yes... I see a big part of my job as a Education Technology Specialist (i.e. Learning Technologist) is having a certain amount of autonomy in how I interact with "clients", yet little if any authority to direct change, instead its a matter of presenting experiences, ideas and suggestions (expertise) to "guide" a "client" to another way to realize their instructional objectives. They typically seek me out formally (via email requesting an appointment) or informally (over lunch or a chat in the hall). Yet critical to it is fostering a non threatening relationship with potential "clients" so that they feel comfortable about discussing such things. It sounds curiously similar to a relationship that you might find between a patient and a therapist, where there's a need for "confidentiality", and the building of "trust" or building a non threatening, safe environment for open dialogue because in many cases, the potential client feels insecure about raising the issue. They often apologetically present themseleves as unfamiliar with something, feeling vulnerable in doing so, so that they realize they need to learn more, that they are depending on me for guidance.. yet ultimately the final decision on "if" they will move forward rests with them.

Curiously enough, I've never seen such a "soft skill" presented in any LT job description. While the expertise, experience and rhetorical discourse are important, I've discovered just how critical nurturing this sort of relationship is to realizing the next step - being "invited" to enter into such a dialogue and then present one's expertise or opinions to help inform opinion. Thus the point made about "investing considerable time in building goodwill and strong collaborations across the institution" (Oliver p 249)

I'm equally curious about how many others in the cohort share this observation.

I also see a strong need to be challenging things ... even those presented by my colleagues in the department. They have been tempting me to use "off the shelf" solutions (with best of intentions I might add) .. yet I've resisted on the very grounds mentioned by Lisewski - the need for them to be challenged as to their relevance to our context. At issue here, is the use of screen cams from Atomic Learning and my insistence on the need to use self authored screen cams using Jing. This on the grounds that Jing produced resources are easy to produce, easier to access and invite greater familiarity and thus more built in support for our end users - namely faculty. Atomic Learning videos are more difficult to get to (require password and then navigation to a set example), and are not context specific .. thus requiring the "target learner" to build the relevance and context themselves .... to understand the purpose of the support resource.

Activity 6.2 - The Profession of Learning Technologist

Source

Oliver, Martin (2002) ‘What do Learning Technologists do?’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 30(4), pp. 245-252.


Wow!!
This has been a tremendously useful article to me for a number of reasons.. Number one? It's given me a clearer sense of the unusual nature of the educational technologist position - one that in essence, I have but with a different wording - Senior Educational Technology Specialist.

The three categories of LTs
  • new specialists - multiskilled, going from place to place with learning technology as the core of their identity
  • academics who have incorporated learning tech into their existing professional identity
  • learning support professionals who are in non academic roles but support access to and effective use of learning technology
I really have to wonder which of these three classifcations I and others in my H809 cohort fall into. (create a survey) . I have always considered myself an educator first and directly involved in the use of technology in education for at least fiften years now. In the last 10 years I've worn the EFL instructor hat but that's also been a field active in finding ways to integrate technology to realize learning outcomes.

I feel I've aspects of all three....
LTs need each other .. but why aren't they connected and where are they to connect?
No 1 ranking was the need to keep abreast of current developments in learning technologies. Yes.. and typically not directly supported or assessed by my current employer.. seems to be too little time to realize this... thus fostering my need to network with others to see how they realize this ... I've been actively seeking out such online communities and have found them in all shapes and sizes. To make the task more manageable, I've chosen to connect with those that are from back home.. But noticeably absent is any work on similar online communities in the Gulf region thus encouraging me to perhaps realize this to support networking amongst other LTs in this region.
Typical job description? collaboration
Oliver mentioned a three step process .. essentially
  • Step 1 - identify opport for collaboration w/ discipline based academics
  • Step 2 - provide meaningful input to the collaboration (tech advice) and using the opport to learn more about the collaborator's values, concerns, and context
  • Step 3 - select, adapt, and present relevant "cases", expertise, research material, to support, challenge, foster refection for critical discussion with collaborator

Note that this suggests an advising role but an LT is armed with a fair amount of knowledge that can in effect direct the instructor in their selection of tools to meet instructional objectives. This really rang true to me - personal experience with it and it was conforting to see this spelled out in such clear cut terms. An LT is in effect, a change agent - armed with information about tech, but also armed with an understanding of learning theories so that there is some understanding of how the tech can be integrated into instruction. At least one very important, missing ingredient to make change happen .....?
Context is king!
However, for any of this to happen, understanding the "needs' or "interests" or "culture" of the instructor has to be seen as a clear cut starting point before anything can be realized. Oliver's use of the term "learner centered model for professional development" summarizes this.. and is something I've direct experience in doing, each time I work with a faculty member. I still struggle with the description of this being a model of professional development as "expert learning".
Professional aspect?
This need for specialized knowledge and deeper understanding of a variety of elements -
  • managing change,
  • collaborating with a wide variety of clients
  • understanding pedagogical frameworks / learning theories
Self monitoring of when and how to introduce, integrate, impart such information to the benefit of a client - drawing on knowledge (from experience, from reading, from networking with other LTs) much like a doctor does to help a patient (?). Inferring a fair amount of autonomy when collaborating with a client ...
Key processes?
  • Collaboration (which requires huge amounts of time to build goodwill and trust)
  • Specialist expertise (understanding of current developments / issues in elearning; strategies to help uncover and address them)
  • Rhetorical skills (to influence development and decision making by others)
autonomy + lack of authority + initiator of change
Key weakness? Perception of LTs by those they seek to serve
Credibility in the eyes of academics. "If (LTs) cannot establish their credentials with hte academics, then it is unlikely that fruitful dialogue will follow, since the collaborator will see them as a service provider rather than an expert."

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Activity 6.1 - eLearning as a profession

Sources

Higher Education Academy Professional Standards Consultation (n.d.) ‘Standards framework for teaching and supporting student learning in HE’, [online] Available from: http://www.alt.ac.uk/HEA_professional_standards_consultation_20051012.html (Accessed 16 November 2008).



ALT, (n.d.) ‘SECOND CONSULTATION ON THE PROPOSAL TO FORM
A LIFELONG LEARNING SECTOR SKILLS COUNCIL - Questionnaire’, [online] Available from: http://www.alt.ac.uk/docs/questionnaire_lluk_ALT.pdf (Accessed 16 November 2008).


What are the specifications for education and training couses aimed at elearning professionals?

Very difficult to find any definitions on this .. all of them seem to come out of the UK though by taking more time to mine the job descriptions for learning technologists in the US this might become easier to address.
From
Higher Education Academy Professional Standards Consultation
An elearning professional is someone who ...
  • makes appropriate / judicious use of technology to realize learning outcomes
  • has an indepth understanding of learning theory and its application to online learning design
  • makes efforts to work with others to enhance and inform each other's practice, knowledge and experience
From Anonymous, (n.d.) ‘SECOND CONSULTATION ON THE PROPOSAL TO FORM A LIFELONG LEARNING SECTOR SKILLS COUNCIL - Questionnaire’
An elearning professional is someone who ..
  • systematically applies a body of knowledge to the design, implementation and evaluation of learning resources
  • uses principles of good learning theory, good instructional design and change management to support learning and provide learning resources
  • is grounded in the use of technologies and their capabilities to support learning
Compare these specifications with your own education and training.
My own formal and informal education is a mix of visual arts training, museum management, adult education, english as a foreign language training and teaching and my current studies in the MA with the Open U. It's a very eclectic mix but I've also noticed that all of these educational / subject domains have been greatly affected by information technology. I have had to learn learning theory on at least three separate ocassions and maybe more - each from a different perspective (i.e. general, adult and online). Most of my own learning about effective use of technology has been informed by earlier courses in the Open U program. Much of the learning theory has been informed via reflection and integration into my own teaching practice, much of the appropriate selection of technology in education comes from direct experience and reflection on it. In almost all cases, the Open U program has served to more formally recognize my experience and efforts.
My formal qualifications .. constant theme?
Education. in environments that seem to promote or encourage innovation / dealing with change / promoting creativity .. and to do so under fairly close scrutiny by others (i.e. visual arts - public art displays, cultural sector - leveraging scarce time and money resources, adult education - targeted needs, efl - multi mode teaching leveraging scarce time and money resources to realize learning outcomes for students).
Compare this with the education and training of the H808 course team
I recognized that the team placed a certain amount of emphasis on experience with computer mediated communications and learning, the need to be current and connected with a community of practice, and the need to make one's work transparent (open to scrutiny and input from peers). I sense I've had two of the three drilled into me by work demands. The middle point is one that I grew to value while working in the cultural sector - the importance of networking with others to inform one's practice.

Other repeated themes? The need for ethics, standards to support one's work. The importance of striving for quality. The need to be part of a community of practice to constantly inform one's practice in a field whose context seems to be constantly changing.These sorts of values, curiously enough, were emparted in me via my work in alternative education while working in the cultural sector - where public scrutiny and validation were very important to ensuring "buy in".

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Reflections - Activity 5.3 group work

From my vantage point, we have struggled to realize this task as a group.
Possible causes, we may have indirectly imposed a limitation on our selves by choosing to start and carry on discussions / exchanges via the FCC board. Curiously, a comfort level with using this, despite having had some exposure to the affordances of wikis and blogs; having them modelled to us in prior weeks. We overlooked choosing how to tackle the problem as a group;working out roles; breaking the task down into small tasks; not review and examine our strengths as members of the group; not coming on board at the same time .... all of it indicating to me that we did not reflect deeply enough on the most appropriate tool nor how to facilitate our task.. and thus undermined our own success or at least slowed it down dramatically.

My contribution to this? A dreadfully late move into 5.3 after spending too much time on 5.2. I felt a need to assert a role as a "Co-ordinator" / "Team
I'm in agreement with anything at this point that gives us some more structure .. such that it facilitates more collaboration. We have a lot of interesting and well developed ideas here but I find the current arrangement highly fragmented and difficult to follow (ie. not one or two but many discussion threads). I would really like to encourage that all of this information be put in one common place so that we can collate it, reflect on it - I would like to suggest the wiki that Nigel set up .. but I'm happy to have it anywhere. No ownership issues here, just acting as an elearning practitioner in identifying what in my opinion is the "best choice" of utility to realize the learning that we are being asked to do here ..

NOTE: I've become well aware about how this whole process is a lovely test of our ability to be elearning practitioners - using good practice in realizing this task involves
  • understanding the limitations of online communications
  • identifying the best of technology to realize learning
  • identifying and applying the best strategies to overcome or manage limitations
  • promoting collaboration / buy in amongst us
  • realizing something meaningful / purposeful in the process
I'm even wondering if whatever principles we come up with can be tested against our success in realizing this activity. That would certainly point out their relevance.

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Reflections - Activity 5.2 Case studies from the Carnegie & Hewlett Foundations

(prior to going to the FCC message board)

Reflections on my review of case studies

Key points that need to be present for a case study / research study to be convincing for me
  • relevance of the topic to myself and others
  • transferability of the ideas to other contexts(hopefully including my own)
  • clarity of explanation to allow
    • its benefits to be understood
    • the study to be repeated
  • the attractiveness of the benefits (learning / teaching)
  • the ease at which it can be repeated
  • its underlying educational philosophy is either stated directly or clearly inferred
  • flexible .. addresses a number of needs / interests
Possible framework for a good poster?
  • context is clearly stated
  • purpose / need / issue stated clearly
  • principle of the project outlined
  • resources required for the project
  • methods clearly outlined.. and benefits resulting from them outlined

Reflections - Unit 5 (opening section)

This caught my eye in the opening of Unit 5 .

"two factors that determine the effectiveness of a professional in any area of occupation are
  • the quality of their sources of information - timeliness, pertinence, reliability
  • their ability to apply intelligence to that information (determine what is relevant in each information source, and how best to make use of it)

Paul Lefrere & Robin Goodfellow

Thinking immediately of my work in the ELC a few years back when I used electronic surveys to identify faculty needs but I also made a point of reviewing and assessing the traditional delivery mode for workshops - face to face - largely on a hunch that the current strategy wasn't working. Identified the need for a rethink .. because attendance at past workshops was consistently poor .. yet the same needs were still being expressed in the surveys. This told me that there was a crying need for more flexibility to complement the faculty situation / environment.

I entertained the possibility of capitalizing on the constant availability of the network .. to devise a new strategy that was less proximity dependent (the need for a scheduled time and place to present IT support workshops). That led to the development of a four prong strategy consisting of tipsheets, screen cams, one to one tutoring.. all designed to complement the traditional "face to face" strategy.

The result? Subsequent online surveys noted tipsheets and screen cams as number one support method ... while face to face was still seen as highly desireable.. yet attendance remained abysmal (what people were voting for in a survey, they weren't prepared to vote for with their "feet").

What does it point out to me now .. the importance of challenging assumptions, making decisions when possible based upon data. The data is powerful for informing one's decisions and supporting their close scrutiny by others. However.. the data doesn't offer all the answers .. I realize more clearly now the need to review them in their context. For example, if I was to go on the choices made in the survey, we would still be using only the "face to face" strategy.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Activity 2.1 - applications of eportfolios

http://buckinsand.blogspot.com/2008/10/activity-21-applications-of-eportfolios_02.html

Key readings chosen

Batson, T. (2002) The electronic portfolio boom ..
Batson, T. (2008) ePortfolios: Hot Once Again (not listed)
Jafari, A. (2004) The sticky eportfolio system
Steffani, L. (2005) PDP/CPD and eportfolios: rising to the challenge
Vuorikari, R. (2006) National policies and case studies

Discussion points from
Molley 2, Janet (26, Sep, 2008) re(6): eportfolios and community education) - discussion board
Cheer, Peter C (25, Sep, 2008) Re(4): eportfolios and community education
Nkuyubwatsi, Bernard (27, Sep, 2008) - Re(5): eportfolios and community education,


General topics that emerged from all of the readings
1) advantages of eportfolios are many and the notion is not likely to disappear
2) yet there are significant challenges that need to be addressed if the benefits ascribed to using eportfolios are to be realized

There is consensus amongst the writers that eportfolios are not a passing fancy. Batson argues that they are here to stay because they naturally capitalize on the growing number of students with IT competencies (Batson, 2002) and their growing ability to produce digital work. Jafari (2004) outlines how its benefits are extended to other stakeholders besides students and in ways that were not thought of as possible before. Examples include facilitating career development (soft skill and aptitude review), accreditation (program review) and tenure. A key point is that eportfolios are likely to stay, not because of their technological advantages but because of their pedagogical advantages (Martin).

Eportfolios provide many new opportunities. Batson notes for students, the ability to visualize their learning development or to provide evidence of their actual work to support a transcript. This reflective process and the skills associated with it personalize learning for students, promote a culture of lifelong learning and according to both Vuorikari and Steffani, come to be enthusiastically supported by students "once they understand reflective learning".

Teachers note how eportfolios promote deeper learning from their students. Students can demonstrate their understanding of theory not just with individual assignments but with their practice over time. Such a combination invites new forms of "real assessment" (Vuorikari) based upon reflection on and discussion of what has been learned. Students can share their findings with fellow students to test and construct meaning. Students can also review where they are in a selected learning program and plan accordingly (Janet Molley) thus inviting more personalization of learning programs. As Batson notes (2008) the eportfolio in effect becomes a virtual "learning environment" available almost anytime and anywhere by the increasingly ubiquitous nature of the internet.

However, all four readings also noted the challenges that need to be overcome if these opportunities are to be fully realized. Vuorikari notes the need for eportfolios to be used in a meaningful and purposeful way when made part of the learning process (Vuorikari p. 13). Benefits need to be clearly modeled to students to promote their buyin (Jafari) and to promote their use of reflective practices (Stefani). Standardization of design may also be needed to improve ease of use and interoperability (Jafari) but it needs to be done in balance with promoting flexibility otherwise it risks undermine the reflective aspect (Vuorikari) . Training to realize these benefits also extends beyond just students and faculty. Vuorikari notes how parents too need to be trained to understand how to support eportfolio practice. Stefani's stresses the need for evidence of "action" (after reflection) that supports one's claim to pdp or cpd. In other words, she argues assessment of an eportfolio becomes an important requisite in either case. However teachers have identified that assessment often risked becoming more summative and thus marginalized formative assessment and the skills associated with promoting lifelong learning (Jafari). As Bernard poignantly noted, this same desire to support life long learning through the use of eportfolios requires that the process become habit forming for students. Thus the design, implementation and integration of eportfolios can not be deemed to be a simple task.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Refection - Activity 4.1 - creating multimedia components

This Unit got under my skin a bit ... so I let loose on the FCC message board with the following to my group. It started out for me as a pretty simple rant "Multimedia beware" ... then grew into a bit of a reflection piece for me. A confrontation with myself between the academic reasons for using multimedia and the real "fears" or "concerns" for perhaps avoiding them.

_____________

I'm going to go "out on a limb" here and say that I'd like to challenge the use of multimedia. I also want to say that I'm even a bit disappointed by the resources that I've read in Unit 4.1. I say this because I haven't read anything on the appropriate selection of multimedia (perhaps I've missed something on the topic and I'd love to read about it if its there - do tell) From my experience the use of voice and video really only serve a purpose if the affective qualities that they communicate are important to supporting / enhancing the message or are part of the message (ie.. emotion, enthusiasm, body language, visual cues etc.) If these elements are not seen as important..or are not thought of carefully they can even become a distraction from the message or undermine the message. I've seen my share of poorly made TV shows (available on almost 90% of the channels available to us in the UAE) that have only served to reinforce the point.

Now I realize that the opposite can be said about email or text messaging .. and people sometimes go to great lengths to add that emotional quality via "emoticons". I'd argue that email or text messaging works great until there is a need to convey emotion .. to communicate the message with nuances.. or to minimize the risk of an email message sounding too "turse" or "harsh". Then I might consider using audio or video to communicate my message.

This then begs the question. When might I want to use multimedia as part of an eportfolio? Are there situations when I might want to use audio or video? I've been reflecting on this .. and have managed to come up with the following. By "honestly" conveying my message through multimedia.. by "honestly" conveying my message along with all of its non verbal cues .. I may be granting more authenticity to my presentation. I stressed the word "honestly" because I can't help but think that if it isn't done honestly .. then its likely scripted instead .. then the authenticity of the message "goes out the window" - the reader / viewer may not buy it.

Then there's the other side of the issue. Even if I'm trying to be honest and sincere, I know that I'm confronting my own sorted of "performance" anxiety - asking myself all sorts of questions.
  • "How did I come across?"
  • "Should I repeat this?"
  • "I didn't like that part".
  • "Let's do it over again".
So while it can seem fun to some.. it can also be work too - creating a slew of anxieties in my quest to realize some sort of "carefully crafted identity".

I guess what I'm saying here is that I'm incredibly conscious of these affective qualities and perhaps how difficult it can be to either confront them (to make the choice to do them), surrender to them (accept the fact that any such performance will not be perfect) or control them (trying to shape the final product through scripting or rehearsing).

Leading me to conclude, how I confront the use of multimedia and when I use it, is always likely to be a display of not only my technical expertise / skill in using them but my level of confidence in confronting how and when I think I can use them effectively.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Activity 3.3 Understanding eportfolio software (preview)

I'm speculating before I begin this review that the following features will be most important to me or to my hypothetical students..

1) ease of use
It has to be easy enough to learn. That can be achieved with built in support or readily available JIT tutorials.

2) flexibility yet structure
Dichotomy here, one wants flexibility yet there is a certain amount of structure needed, certainly for an absolute beginner who may need a set of guided questions. But a more experienced user may opt to drop this structure in favour of getting more freedom to design as they see fit.

3) interoperability / portability
If I'm going to invest so much time and energy into something and over an extended period of time.. then I need to feel confident that whatever I'm using will be transferable to another system.

4) support / modelling of benefits
For anyone just starting on this trek to build an eportfolio, their ability to "see" the benefits of an eportfolio and how those benefits can be easily realized is fundamental to realizing "buying in" ... That equates to providing clear models / examples and constantly available support. That support can come in many forms - interaction / collaboration with ones peers, and/or IT support agents.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Activity 2.4 - Criteria for reflective writing

Readings
Moon (2001)
Richards (2005)

Advice to students on good reflective writing.


You need to understand what reflection is first, what its importance is to helping you learn. You likely already do it in a "non academic" common sense way , to think about something in more detail but often in a free thought or unstructured way (i.e. without a specific purpose or reason to do so) (Moon, 2001).

However we want you to practice more academic based reflection. Why? Academic based reflection is more guided, more purposeful. Reflection here is seen as realizing a deeper understanding of things, to connect that understanding with other things you know or to even challenge what you may already know. It often involves a critical evaluation of what you know to come up with more "sound", more "grounded, perhaps more confident judgements (Habermas) of things you have experienced and have come to "know". The alternative is to simply understand things in a simple, unconnected, isolated manner (Moon - surface learning). It can be seen not as a static "one off" process but part of a cycle featuring action then thought; a process of acting then refining your understanding of what it is you've done .. to then possibly repeat that action but with adjustments made that are based on your new understanding of the action (Kolb - experiential learning) . That process can be repeated to become an "activity reflection" cycle (Richards) directed to improving your understanding of things which in turn help move you closer to realizing a desired goal, overcoming an obstacle or solving a problem.

Put into the context of reflective writing, writing takes on new meaning. Writing means summarizing something. The content for that summary might be a thought, theory, experience or feeling. The act of summarizing invites you to interpret and personalize this content further. Reflecting on this writing invites you to relate these ideas to previous experiences to further personalize them or give them more meaning. You may find yourself going back to the same writing again and again, each time reviewing and refining it because your ideas have been changed by new experiences or ideas that impact on your understanding of the initial idea. These may test or challenge your earlier views causing a complete rewrite of them or they may invite you to refine the wording of them still more. Over time, you realize a deeper understanding of your initial idea. All of the writing, reviewing and editing also becomes a record of something potentially more useful to you - a deeper understanding of your learning processes.

This reflective writing process can be broadened through the inclusion of your peers. Their review or questioning of your work can also draw your attention to common themes or contradictions in your ideas. These too can cause you to clarify or refine your understanding of ideas.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Activity 2.4 - My take on Penn State advice for reflection

My take on the Penn State example

There is evidence of the Hatton & Smith (Moon) format to scaffold reflective writing (reflective writing steps) . There is also the inclusion of a rubric to guide the student in what they might expect to realize as a "quality" end product.. (which suggests that this could still be assessed).

Yet in the beginning, much of it sounds like a "common sense approach" to reflection. This is being presented yet the rubric and scaffolding suggest otherwise which confuses the matter. For example, using terms like "think about your audience - it may be only yourself", "you are the one responsible for making decisions about your educational program". "What you write depends on your audience" yet "the audience is left up to you.. and can be you."

I would have liked to see a stronger introduction. One that promotes "buyin" perhaps via testimonials from past students, faculty members, etc. One that points out the benefits of the reflection activity .. but also suggests a variety of strategies that others have used to realize the quality end product that the rubric suggests. This would echo the two step approach put forward by Moon (2001). In this case, first introducing reflection with a definition, plus reasons / benefits and perhaps for it and some manner of experiencing it. Then following that with the set of very general questions already used in the "Reflective Writing Steps (Penn U) or perhaps by Lister (2006), both of which echo those suggested by Hatton & Smith (Moon). This becomes a scaffolding strategy to help someone who may still not understand the concept or how to realize it in an academic sense.

Moon's two step approach is the basis for the following.. From my vantage point, the key thing learned here is to make it very clear....
- what reflection is
- what form of reflection we're encouraging a person to pursue (academic)
- what the clear purpose / benefit of this activity is to the person
- present evidence to support that benefit
- present an opportunity for the person to experience it .. to improve their understanding
- scaffold the learner further with guided questions.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Activity 2.2 - my blog

This supplementary activity required that we set up a blog to support reflective work. The suggestion was made to set it up using the one provided to me by the Open U. I'm not terribly fond of the one that they have so I've opted to continue to use this one (though I think if I could I'd be looking for one that uses Wordpress so that I could tap into the templates - I think they have still a better look and feel to them).

Sorry everyone at the Open U but it's really not that pleasing to the eye - not at all. No eye candy. Never thought that it would matter to me but when one sees what one can do with Blogger than its IMO no contest. Not that this is that much better but I've got a lot more flexibility as to how I can format / personalize the look of this one .. and I'm familiar with how easy it is to insert multimedia into it.

However, in fairness I understand that it may be easier for Open U instructors to support others who may not be familiar with blogs.